Islamic learning through social media among muslim youth: a systematic review of religious engagement, identity, and participation (2011–2026)

Abstract

Social media now sits alongside the mosque, family, and classroom as an ordinary setting in which Muslim youth encounter religious knowledge, yet evidence on Islamic learning remains fragmented across disciplines. This review addresses that fragmentation. Following PRISMA 2020 and the SPIDER framework, a Scopus search using TITLE-ABS-KEY(Islam AND "social media" AND ("Generation Z" OR youth)) identified 62 records published between 2011 and 2026. Screening based on document type, language, and topical relevance was documented through an auditable decision matrix, with an independent rule-based re-screening yielding 95.2% agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.88). Eighteen empirical journal articles were retained and appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT 2018), with no study excluded on quality grounds. Two research questions examined how social media facilitates Islamic learning and religious engagement (RQ1) and the reported patterns of religious understanding, identity, and participation (RQ2). The synthesis shows that digital Islamic learning involves an ecology of access, interactive and multimodal instruction, and peer validation, making source credibility a core competence. Religious understanding, identity, and participation emerge as interconnected processes through which young Muslims engage with digital audiences. The review further suggests that digital spaces complement and reconfigure rather than displace established religious authority, which increasingly operates through interactive credibility and peer trust. Because the evidence is predominantly qualitative and concentrated in Indonesia, findings remain context-bounded. Key methodological gaps include validated measures of digital piety, controlled online–offline comparisons, and longitudinal research, providing directions for future studies.

Keywords
  • Digital religion
  • Islamic learning
  • Muslim youth
  • Religious engagement
  • Social media
How to Cite
Darmawati, D. (2026). Islamic learning through social media among muslim youth: a systematic review of religious engagement, identity, and participation (2011–2026). Southeast Asian Journal of Technology and Science, 7(1), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.29210/810712600
References
  1. Abdullah, A. D. A., & Chan, C. M. L. (2016). Social media use among teenagers in Brunei Darussalam. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9844, pp. 195–205). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_18
  2. Abdurrahman, M. S., Widyaningrum, S. Y., Dulwahab, E., Ali, A., & Parsono, S. (2026). Mediating piety: How Salafism, WhatsApp and youth leadership are transforming Islamic authority in Indonesia's urban hijrah movement. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00118_1
  3. Ådna, G. M. (2019). Sacred texts and Muslim youth in Turkish-Norwegian diaspora communities. In A critical study of classical religious texts in global contexts (pp. 87–100). Peter Lang.
  4. Ahmad, K. B., Ibrahim, F. Z., & Shatilla, Q. S. (2025). The response of Muslim youth in Banda Aceh toward Islamic contemporary issues in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 25(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v25i1.16606
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Chakim, S. (2022). The youth and the internet: The construction of doctrine, Islam in practice, and political identity in Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(1), 217–236.
  7. Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
  8. Demerdash, N. (2024). Mipsterz' visual constructions of cool: Muslim hipsters and the sartorial self-fashioning of modest subcultures in transnational digital diasporas. Mashriq & Mahjar, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24847/v11i12024.282
  9. Deroo, M. R., & Mohamud, I. (2022). "I would rather be informed than misinformed": Critical conversations supporting transnational religious identity across time and space. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2021-0105
  10. Dwifatma, A. (2026). Ta'aruf, pious asceticism, and shared meaning-making in Islamic YouTube web series. Wacana, 27(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v27i1.2097
  11. El Naggar, S. (2014). The impact of digitization on the religious sphere: Televangelism as an example. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 4(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v4i2.189-211
  12. El Naggar, S. (2024). Muslim identities in contemporary televangelists' online discourse. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67994-0
  13. Faizah, N., Bakti, A. F., Rahman, Y., & Muslimin, J. M. (2024). Systematic literature review: Social media usage in Generation Z from the perspective of digital ethics and Islamic ethics. In 2024 12th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM64103.2024.10775411
  14. Fauzi, M. L., & Pribadi, Y. (2024). Muslim youth between pragmatism, Islamic concern, and social piety: The case of the da'wah movement in Solo, Indonesia. Ulumuna, 28(2), 798–824. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i2.877
  15. Hasan, F. (2022). Muslim Instagram: Eternal youthfulness and cultivating deen. Religions, 13(7), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070658
  16. Herdiansah, A. G. (2026). Digital Islamist activism and popular culture: Propagating Islamism among Indonesian youth. Studia Islamika, 33(1), 35–70. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v33i1.45509
  17. Hidayatullah, A. F., & Hamzah, A. (2017). The impact of Islamic messages on Twitter towards Moslem youth. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 185, 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/185/1/012010
  18. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., … Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
  19. Jafar, N., Lampe, M., Muhammad, M. J., Muhamad, D., Guntur, A. I., & Hasyim, A. (2025). Gender and religiosity in Indonesian popular media: An anthropological reading of cultural representations. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 23(2), 667–695. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlka.v23i2.1489
  20. Kadir, K. A., Ashaari, N. S., & Salim, J. (2017). Initial model of social media Islamic information credibility. In Proceedings of the 2017 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2017.8312340
  21. Mohamad, S. M. (2023). Youth religiosity and social media in Brunei Darussalam. In Asia in transition (Vol. 20, pp. 51–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6059-8_4
  22. Nisa, E. F. (2018a). Social media and the birth of an Islamic social movement: ODOJ (One Day One Juz) in contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1416758
  23. Nisa, E. F. (2018b). Creative and lucrative dawa: The visual culture of Instagram amongst female Muslim youth in Indonesia. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340085
  24. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  25. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Lancaster University / ESRC Methods Programme.
  26. Rahman, M. T., & Mufti, M. (2021). Massification of youth religious studies to prevent juvenile delinquency in Bandung. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), a7055. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.7055
  27. Rijal, S. (2022). Consuming and disputing Aisha song: The quest for pleasure and Islamic romance in contemporary Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v12i1.1-29
  28. Shabdan, B. (2026). Social media and religious engagement among Muslim youth in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2026.2623158
  29. Sheikh, F. (2020). Korean Muslims: Shaping Islamic discourse and identities online. European Journal of Korean Studies, 19(2), 129–147.
  30. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  31. Syarif, S., Herlambang, S., & Suratman, B. (2023). Quran interpretation methodology, new media, and ideological contestation of Salafi in Sambas. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), a8814. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8814
  32. Taherifard, A. (2022). Shia clerics, holy sites, and the online visual culture of the revolutionary youth in Iran. Religions, 13(6), 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13060542
  33. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  34. Wahid, A., & Wardatun, A. (2023). "Digital resources are not reliable": Peer-group-based intellectualism among Muslim youth activists in Bima, Eastern Indonesia. Religions, 14(8), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081001
  35. Williams, J. P., & Kamaludeen, M. N. (2017). Muslim girl culture and social control in Southeast Asia: Exploring the hijabista and hijabster phenomena. Crime, Media, Culture, 13(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016687346